Investigating BCL differences between .NET and Metro/WinRT

In the previous post, I’ve explained how to use WinRT APIs from a .NET Desktop application to list the installed Metro App packages. This post is dedicated to the other side of the story: what part of the Microsoft .NET Base Class Library is usable from a C# Metro App.

Where are my assemblies?
Let’s create an empty Metro App via the Blank Visual Studio template and look at its references:

Since “.NET for Metro style apps” sounds quite abstract, open up its properties:
The exact name of the assembly is not provided but only the folder where it should be found. I’m using the “it” word but I should use “they” instead. Unlike Dekstop .NET application where each exact required assembly file is listed in the References of the project, Metro .NET App projects simply refers to .NET as a whole.

If you need to figure out from which exact assembly the BCL types definition comes from, simply “Go To Definition” on a type in C# source code. For example, type StringBuilder and right-click it to select Go To Definition (or type F12 directly). Visual Studio then opens up a “view” of the type generated from its metadata:

At the top of the file, you get the full path of the .dll containing the metadata for StringBuilder type:

This folder contains many .dll files that contain just the types definition metadata without any IL code: the equivalent of .winmd files but for the Base Class Library! Note that the comments provided by Visual Studio are extracted from the sibling .xml files in the same folder.

A different packaging

When you have played with StringBuilder and other BCL types for a long time, System.Runtime.dll does not sound familiar at all. If you create a dummy C# console application and go to definition of StringBuilder, you end up with a different result:

A different folder for a different (but expected) assembly.

Is it a different story at runtime?

Let’s start the Console application and check which .dlls are loaded with Process Explorer from Sysinternals:

Here is the corresponding list for a C# Metro App:

The same .dll files are loaded from the same folder. So there must be a kind of forward mechanism between the assemblies referenced at compile time and the real assemblies loaded at runtime.

In the same Metro App, let’s find the System.Runtime.dll that was referenced as containing the definition of the StringBuilder type in Process Explorer. Here are its properties; including the full path from which it has been loaded:

If you load this .dll in your favorite .NET decompiler, you’ll find a lot of System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TypeForwardedToAttribute defined at the assembly level like the following ILSpy screenshot:

including the StringBuilder type from which this post was started.

Using Reflection is an easy way to know in which assembly StringBuilder is really implemented at runtime. Write the following code in your Metro App:

And you’ll get the following output:
System.Text.StringBuilder, mscorlib, Version=, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089

Defined in System.Runtime.dll and implemented in the expected mscorlib.dll.

For more details about the Metro .NET profile, watch “A .NET developer’s view of Windows 8 App Development” by Krysztof Cwalina and read “Type Forwarding” by David Broman for type forwarding.

I hope this helps

About these ads
This entry was posted in .NET, C#, Metro, Release Preview, WinRT and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Investigating BCL differences between .NET and Metro/WinRT

  1. Pingback: Windows 8 Developer Links – 2012-06-18Dan Rigby | Dan Rigby

  2. Pingback: Investigating BCL differences between .NET and Metro/WinRT

  3. Daniel Plaisted says:

    Another good video to watch for more background information about this is this Channel 9 “Going Deep” video:

  4. Pingback: Metro Developers Digest #5 - Общение с пользователями, Windows 8, инструменты для Windows Phone и 4th and Mayor | DreamTeam Experience

  5. Pingback: Missing BCL types in WinRT | Anything about WinRT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s